SHARE

Traffic Roots is a cannabis ad network that serves ads worldwide. Here we will go through the details and compare it to other cannabis ad networks. When we tried out Traffic Roots the result was not so hot. Traffic Roots made substantially less than the two other major networks.

Traffic Roots: One of the newest ad networks for cannabis related traffic

When it comes to ad networks, publishers are looking to get the most per click and view. DabConnection is a non-affiliate site with no paid links, paid reviews, or paid posts. So the site’s only revenue is generated from ad revenue, currently Mantis Ad Network and before we have used Puff Network. To cut it short, at this point Mantis Ad Network is the best way to go as a publisher in the cannabis space looking to use a cannabis ad network.

traffic roots
Logo for Traffic Roots

A new ad platform is born in San Diego

Traffic Roots was started in 2016 by Christian Valdez who is the company’s CEO. The company is based in San Diego, California and serves ads to international customers. It received seed funding in the amount of $250,000 from Canopy Boulder’s San Diego operation which was closed after one year. Canopy helps cannabis companies get started with funding and guidance. At that time, Traffic Roots was valued at $2,500,000.

What Traffic Roots Offers Publishers and Advertisers

For Publishers, Traffic Roots offers payments based on CPM. Publishers get paid per 1,000 impressions made for display ads. Traffic Roots does not have content ads or video ads in its platform.

Advertising on the Traffic Roots network

Pricing is simple on the advertising end, $8 CPM. Every 1,000 views of your ad will cost $8. Advertisers pay that rate and do not pay per click, so the efficiency of the money spent is up to the effectiveness of the advertiser’s ad. The $8 CPM rate is comparable with the rest of the cannabis industry. The typical CPM range for cannabis ads is between $5 and $10. Some sites charge as high as $15, but those are probably not being used by the shrewd advertiser.

Sources of traffic for Traffic Roots

The vast majority of traffic on the network is from the United States and Canada is second, which is the case for all cannabis ad networks. Traffic Roots does not just display to cannabis sites. There are cannabis friendly sites and adult sites also in their network.

Adult traffic vs cannabis traffic

Adult traffic goes for much lower rates than cannabis traffic. Ero Advertising is a popular ad network for adult sites. Their CPM payout to publishers averages just 11 cents according to AdSpyGlass. Payouts are correlated to value, and $8 CPM seems expensive for adult networks. If Traffic Roots had the ability to limit advertising to cannabis sites for $8 CPM it would be a better value. Getting mixed in with adult sites at the same rate does not seem to present as good a value as straight cannabis sites. We might see this option in the future and that would add a lot of value for advertisers.

Beyond the value, some advertisers might just not want their products being featured on adult websites. Not something your mom would be proud of to hear that your CBD brand is showing up on porno sites.

Site selection on Traffic Roots

Advertisers cannot block out certain websites on Traffic Roots like they can on Mantis Ad Network. The CPM of $8 seems to be lower than Mantis, but without the ability to optimize sites it is hard to tell which is better. Advertisers can try both and see which works better, but as explained below with current payouts a lot of top cannabis sites may currently shy away from Traffic Roots.

Publishing on the Traffic Roots network

Being a publisher on Traffic Roots gets you about $0.99 CPM. Yes that is 99 cents. DabConnection’s CTR is currently .2%, higher than the average site so this might be a higher payout than some other sites. Making significant revenue as a publisher for Traffic Roots is difficult. Our site currently spends most the money earned back on reviewing more products and more content. 

 

Traffic Roots does not make enough revenue for our site to sustain despite our high CTR. You may not see Traffic Roots on top cannabis sites until they change the payouts structure. Not having native ads also has an impact and is discussed below.

Traffic Roots vs Mantis Ad Network

mantis vs traffic roots
Mantis has some benefits over Traffic Roots

Mantis Ad Network is currently the most popular cannabis advertising network, followed by Puff Network. Compared to Traffic Roots, Mantis wins here hands down. We have solid figures from both Mantis and Traffic Roots for a legitimate comparison. There’s two main reasons Mantis performs better than Traffic Roots for publishers: higher payouts and content ads. Video ads are also available on the Mantis Ad Network, but since video ads do not provide the best user experience we do not use them. A plus though for someone really trying to maximize the profit out of their website.

Mantis Ad Network’s Content ads provide a huge boost

Content advertising, also known as native ads, are suggested reading posts shown typically at the bottom of an organic post. The most popular form of native ads is Taboola. You will see them advertising something about “The Brave Doctor In Flint Who Refused To Be Silenced” by Forbes. They are essentially clickbait, although many of the articles on Mantis are informative and actually worth reading. Traffic Roots does not have content ads, also known as native ads.

A good day of content ad clicks gets closed to almost the full payout from Traffic Roots.

Mantis pays out more for display ads

The only ads that Traffic Roots offers are display ads. Mantis pays out substantially more than Traffic Roots on its display offerings. Below is the one day payout for only display ads on Mantis. Note that it is two days shown here. These are the first two days Mantis was fully up after removing Traffic Roots.

On the first full day of operation Mantis display ads returned $45.18. For two days, November 22 and 23 when Traffic Roots was running in full force, DabConnection made just over $21.

Really though nothing was paid out as mentioned below.

Traffic Roots has a higher minimum payout

We quit traffic roots after a brief time and earned $115. We did not get paid the $115 and were later told it was because we did not meet the minimum payout threshold of $250. That $250 minimum was not stated in the original sign up terms, but is located somewhere else on their site. Since the CPM payout was so low we did not continue Traffic Roots to get to $250, we switched back ASAP.

Mantis has a minimum payout of $100. Much better for small sites starting out that need funds fast. Plus as you will see below, it will take you 8x longer to even get to $100 on Traffic Roots.

Customer service is better at Mantis

Mantis has sometimes been a bit slow to respond when they are busy, but they still respond faster than Traffic Roots. Some responses from Traffic Roots have taken about a week. Mantis has forgotten some requests sometimes, but a follow up email gets another email back within a day.

Mantis clearly wins over Traffic Roots

Overall, Mantis is much more profitable than Traffic Roots. Display ads pay more, content ads exist, and you can even put up videos if you want. On top of that you can run your own ad campaigns within their platform, making things really easy.

At the end of the day without running videos, 100,000 impressions on Traffic Roots gets you about $99. On Mantis, 100,000 impressions will get you about $325 on display ad clicks, $600 on display ad impressions, and $165 on content, totaling $1,090.  I should also note that Mantis does flag some visitors through software. our site has no bots at all, but some of our visits are still flagged. So it is possible Traffic Roots does not flag anything as it does not seem as advanced a network. Even taking that into account and discounting our traffic, Mantis still makes about 8x as much as Traffic Roots.

Traffic Roots vs 420 Network

420 Network is now owned by Mantis Ad Network. Some people might be searching for a comparison of the two, but when someone contacts 420 Network, they will now get a reply from a Mantis representative.

Traffic Roots vs Puff Network

puff network vs traffic roots
Puff Network is currently offline except for their own sites.

Puff Network is currently under a re working and should be up with their new platform sometime during Q1 2019. Our site initially started with Mantis, then went to Puff Network, then Traffic Roots, then back to Mantis. Briefly, Puff Network actually paid out more than Mantis did. They said that once the platform is back up, Puff Network will be doing an 80%/20% split with its publishers on advertising revenue. This would be 80% to the publisher and 20% to Puff Network.

As of right now, Puff Network cannot be used so Traffic Roots is technically better. Once Puff Network is up though, it should be overall better than Traffic Roots since it has content ads. The previous payout from Puff Network was a flat fee on a monthly basis. it was higher than Mantis for some time, but later Mantis would end up making more with growing traffic. Once it is back up, Puff Network probably will be better than Traffic Roots, unless Traffic Roots changes it’s payout structure.

The sudden stop of it all at Puff Network

One huge downside to Puff Network was getting an email mid month that they are closing everything, have to stop ads, and are no longer paying out until it is fixed. This is what got us trying out Traffic Roots in the first place. A planned announcement would have been much better and we believe Puff Network handled it poorly. Some notice would have been proper. Luckily we do not live off our site’s income, but I could see something like that being financially devastating to those that work on their sites full time.

Customer service is about the same

Considering the sudden stop of it all, customer service was not great for both Puff Network and Traffic Roots. They are responsive and courteous at Puff Network, but actions speak louder than words and the shutdown was a headache.

Overall, Puff Network and Traffic Roots both fail for now compared to Mantis on the publishing side of things

When it works, Puff Network pays better, responds faster, and is overall a better running ad network. At this point though they are not operational. I can say the only solidly reliable cannabis ad network has been Mantis.

Should I use Traffic Roots or skip it?

Advertisers might want to give it a try and negotiate a rate lower than $8 CPM. They are only paying out 99 cents on the publisher end, so you might be able to get a lower deal. You may be able to get a lower rate by hitting the sites up directly as well. That same strategy probably will not work as well on a platform like Mantis where clicks and CPM are truly being maximized for the publisher.

Publishers might want to skip Traffic Roots altogether. The payout is insanely low and it would be hard to imagine that any site could even cover it’s basic expenses, let alone be profitable, using Traffic Roots as it’s ad network platform. Our top pick for now is Mantis Ad Network for cannabis ad networks. We hope Traffic Roots improves in the future and offers better payouts for publishers and the ability for advertisers to block out adult sites.

 

4 COMMENTS

  1. Excellent article. I’ve been using Traffic Roots for about 6 months now and find their payout rate abysmal. Mantis Ads not only has a more profitable rate, but as you mentioned they offer content which is actually informative as opposed to clickbait trash.

    • Thanks for commenting and glad to see we are not alone on our assessment! Glad you found Mantis, with Traffic Roots there really is nothing to be made, and really, sites that actually have to buy things to review like ours would run at a loss!

  2. I would advise people against using TrafficRoots. Not only they wouldn’t reply to my Support Tickets, but they mark them “replied” without actually replying a thing. Tragic customer service. They won’t even release my funds ($300). That’s absurd and makes me furious. Do not use Traffic Roots, find a better platform.

What do you think?